Security for whom?
Anthropologists and repressive state elitesAuthor: Ribeiro, Gustavo Lins
Source: Focaal, Volume 2007, Number 50, Winter 2007 , pp. 146-154(9)
Abstract:
The most important political and ethical issues in North American anthropology today concern anthropologists' relationships with the "security and intelligence communities." The call for anthropological participation in warfare has never been so intense, yet recruitment of anthropologists is not new for hegemonic anthropologies. Their relationships with state power have a long history of contradictory political and professional engagements. After a brief discussion of the notion of national security and its intimate relations to nation-state projects and elites, I consider the importance of culture and anthropological knowledge for politicians and conclude first that anthropologists need to be aware of how the discipline and its uses are part of much larger power relations and constraints, and second that anthropological knowledge is already always political.Keywords: ANTHROPOLOGISTS AND THE MILITARY; ANTHROPOLOGY AND POWER; NATIONAL SECURITY AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL PRACTICE; USES OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE
DOI: 10.3167/foc.2007.500111
The requested document is freely available to subscribers. Users without a subscription can purchase this article.
- Sign in below if you have already registered for online access
Sign in

