Author: Strang, Veronica

Source: Nature and Culture, Volume 3, Number 1, Spring 2008 , pp. 41-62(22)

Abstract:

Environmental management in Australia has recently shifted away from local rural communities into the hands of largely urban environmental and government agencies, sparking an intensifying contest for the control of land and resources between geographically and socially stable communities and more mobile translocal groups. There are major disjunctions between the conceptual models promulgated in this contest. Highly specific, holistic, and integrative cultural paradigms of human-environmental interaction vie with an increasingly dominant technomanagerial environmental model emerging from global discourses and knowledge practices. Categorizing "Nature" as a separate, nonhuman domain, this more cosmopolitan approach fails, intellectually and practically, to integrate social and cultural issues into environmental management. Nevertheless, its proponents are provided with increasing authority by their relationships with wider agencies of governance. Building on long-term ethnographic research in Far North Queensland, this paper explores how local and cosmopolitan environmentalisms are contested in a particular ethnographic context.

Keywords: GOVERNANCE; ABORIGINAL ACTIVISM; LOCAL AND GLOBAL DISCOURSES; INTELLECTUAL HEGEMONY

DOI: 10.3167/nc.2008.030104

User name

 

Password

 

 

Remember me

 

 

 

• forgotten your password?
• Sign in via Athens